Why didn’t I think of that?
November 24th, 2008 by SplineGuy
Problem: Which is larger,
or
?
Sure, there’s the easy way: stick it in your calculator. So, make it interesting. Answer the question without using the calculator.
This raises a couple of interesting questions:
1. What do we mean by raising a number to a (terminating) decimal or fractional power?
2. Can I do that without a calculator?
The answer to the first question is, of course, roots. The exponents above can be written as fractions, and we learn in algebra that
![\displaystyle a^{\frac{m}{n}} = \sqrt[m]{a^n} \displaystyle a^{\frac{m}{n}} = \sqrt[m]{a^n}](/latexrender/pictures/54da167c32db9031b1179b51b2609e17.gif)
So, we interpret
as
![2.2^{\displaystyle \frac{33}{10}} = \sqrt[10]{2.2^{33}} 2.2^{\displaystyle \frac{33}{10}} = \sqrt[10]{2.2^{33}}](/latexrender/pictures/c9273f50420afea767663c784778c604.gif)
Similary, we interpret
as
![3.3^{\displaystyle \frac{11}{5}} = \sqrt[5]{3.3^{11}} 3.3^{\displaystyle \frac{11}{5}} = \sqrt[5]{3.3^{11}}](/latexrender/pictures/c55c144cc5325b211942d8f243140332.gif)
What about question 2, then? The answer is, I certainly can’t. There is a fairly easy-to-use algorithm (step-by-step) procedure for calculating square roots by hand. A simple Google search reveals many places to find the algorithm explained. However, the only method I would try for calculating a 10th root or, even, a 5th root by hand might be a series approximation of each root function. You will quickly decide that…
There must be an easier way:
This problem was originally posted over at the Wild About Math! blog that I read regularly. I worked on a few things, off and on for a few days and failed to come up with anything that didn’t require me to multiply 2.2 or 3.3 out 33 or 22 times, respectively. Fortunately, there was a solution posted today and made slap my forehead and say, “Man, I wish I had thought of that…”
(By the way, slapping the forehead should be avoided during a migraine cluster, such as I have been dealing with the last four days)
Here’s the posted solution:




We can also say the following,



Because the function
is a monotonically increasing function for
, then we can say
is larger since 