The Pancake Theorem
Let me begin by saying that these theorems that will follow in this section of my blog will not be in any particular order, especially not in order of importance or preference. They are just popping up as I recall them or come across them.
Today’s Theorem, the pancake theorem, is one that I just came across today. I don’t remember if I have ever seen it before, but I have nominated it as my Theorem du jour.
The theorem says that the area of two plane pancakes (as in 2D, not plain pancakes), of arbitrary shape can be simultaneously bisected by a single straight-line cute of a knife. See the figure
Although, I don’t have time now. I’ll prove this in an update as well has give you the three dimensional version, known as the Ham Sandwich Theorem. . .
Now aren’t you hungry?
UPDATE: Now here’s a proof:
Lemma 1: Given a direction
in the plane, there exists a line with that direction that bisects the figure.
Proof: This follows from the fact that if you create a function that measures the area to one side of the line, it is continuous with respect to the location. Thus, there must exist a line that bisects the area.

Now consider any circle that contains both pancakes and consider the diameter with direction
for
. By Lemma 1, we can make cuts in each pancake that are perpendicular to this diameter. Define
and
as the distance from the center to where these cuts cross the diameter. Then let
.

Because,
and
are opposite directions we have that
as well as
. Thus,
.

Now if
, we are done and have bisected both pancakes. If
then
changes signs over
and since
is continuous, there exists some
such that
. Q.E.D.
As I mentioned there is an extension to this theorem for higher dimension. It is generally refered to as the Ham Sandwich theorem, obtaining its name for the fact that given three solids (e.g., two slices of bread and a slice of ham), there exists a cut that bisects all three simultaneously (giving each two people and exact equal share of all three).






December 2nd, 2005 at 6:47 pm
Nice. I assume [tex]r(\theta)=p(\theta)-q(\theta)[/tex]? The 3d version is an exercise for the reader
December 3rd, 2005 at 10:02 am
Huh?
December 3rd, 2005 at 3:58 pm
Thanks Alex (It is now repaired). I am still not very good at translating my thoughts to blog form. In fact, I had to type that proof three times since I accidentally deleted it twice while entering it into wordpress.
Mom, come on now. I know you’ve wondered whether you could cut two pancakes in two equal portions with one straight cut. Now you know you can. Take that to the bank!
December 9th, 2005 at 2:20 pm
Hmmmmm….. pancakes and ham sandwiches
January 13th, 2007 at 9:36 am
I am getting hungry
February 5th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
WOW impressive!
easier solution to sharing 2 pancakes!!!
1 EACH